Theresa May challenges judges on criminals' use of human rights laws:
Home secretary says legislation could be passed if judges ignore Commons motion declaring that right to family life is not absolute
The government could pass legislation to curb the use of human rights laws by individuals seeking to avoid deportation if judges fail to take heed of a parliamentary motion designed to do so, according to Theresa May.
The home secretary is to ask MPs to pass a motion declaring that the right to a family life – enshrined in Article 8 of the European convention on human rights – is not absolute.
The move is aimed at balancing that right with the need to protect the economic wellbeing of the country, promote public safety and cut crime but is likely to be seen as a direct challenge to the judges who have previously interpreted Article 8 through the development of case law.
According to Home Office figures, last year 185 foreign prisoners successfully appealed against deportation after citing the right to family life.
May said on the Andrew Marr show on BBC1 that there was a problem because parliament had not been clear enough in relation to what the right to a family life was. MPs would be asked to set out what qualifications the government was entitled to set out.
She added: "I would expect that judges will look at what parliament will say and that they will take into account what parliament has said. If they don't then we will have to look at other measures and that could include primary legislation."
The move comes as the government is preparing to impose a new "financial independence" rule intended to curb the numbers of spouses, children and other dependants of migrants coming into the country.
The immigration minister, Damian Green, said: "We will shortly be announcing a major overhaul of the existing family migration rules, to reduce burdens on the taxpayer, promote integration and tackle abuse.
"The reforms will protect the British public from foreign criminals who try to abuse human rights laws to avoid deportation.
"We plan to make it clear when the rights of the law abiding majority will outweigh a foreign criminal's right to family and private life."
The government could pass legislation to curb the use of human rights laws by individuals seeking to avoid deportation if judges fail to take heed of a parliamentary motion designed to do so, according to Theresa May.
The home secretary is to ask MPs to pass a motion declaring that the right to a family life – enshrined in Article 8 of the European convention on human rights – is not absolute.
The move is aimed at balancing that right with the need to protect the economic wellbeing of the country, promote public safety and cut crime but is likely to be seen as a direct challenge to the judges who have previously interpreted Article 8 through the development of case law.
According to Home Office figures, last year 185 foreign prisoners successfully appealed against deportation after citing the right to family life.
May said on the Andrew Marr show on BBC1 that there was a problem because parliament had not been clear enough in relation to what the right to a family life was. MPs would be asked to set out what qualifications the government was entitled to set out.
She added: "I would expect that judges will look at what parliament will say and that they will take into account what parliament has said. If they don't then we will have to look at other measures and that could include primary legislation."
The move comes as the government is preparing to impose a new "financial independence" rule intended to curb the numbers of spouses, children and other dependants of migrants coming into the country.
The immigration minister, Damian Green, said: "We will shortly be announcing a major overhaul of the existing family migration rules, to reduce burdens on the taxpayer, promote integration and tackle abuse.
"The reforms will protect the British public from foreign criminals who try to abuse human rights laws to avoid deportation.
"We plan to make it clear when the rights of the law abiding majority will outweigh a foreign criminal's right to family and private life."
guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
Comments